—>> PRECISION one has to rely on <<— Rules are there for a reason !
—>> ARROGANCE or DECEPTION ? <<—
PCR TESTING only looks for 4 virus particles even though 5,000 virus particles would be needed to be capable of infecting others —>> “You will be called positive when you have got a thousand times fewer particles in that sample than is needed to be an infectious patient” <<—
https://www.dropbox.com/s/wslphu8j8l12r72/Video%203-8-2022%2C%2012%2048%2053%20pm.mp4?dl=0
—» How do scientists know about the presents of a virus? «—
Well easy. Scientists just need to know what to look for. Therefore, scientists search specific primers, which help them identify genomes.
—>> What is a primer in virology? <<—
“Primers are short stretches of DNA that target unique sequences and help identify a unique part of genome — let's say, a gene. Primers are usually 18 to 25 nucleotides long. They can be synthesized in a special lab, and are used in many different ways.”
https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Primer
In other words:
https://www.nature.com/scitable/definition/primer-305/
“Choosing appropriate primers is probably the single most important factor affecting the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)”
https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2105-13-134
“PCR-based detection and identification of viruses assumes a known, relatively stable genome. Unfortunately, high mutation rates may lead to extensive changes in viral nucleic acid sequences making dedicated PCR primer use problematic.”
https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-422X-4-65
How do scientists know which primers to look for? Easy. Scientists are given the primers to look for.
Where do primers come from?
—>> Just go online to design “your” primer for your real time PCR test the “correct way” <<— See how it’s done here:
How To Create Real-Time PCR Primers Using Primer-BLAST:
https://toptipbio.com/real-time-pcr-primer-blast/
Here some comments to the video:
—» How are primers/viruses found? «—
Excerpts:
“New sequencing techniques have helped us uncover a world of new viruses,” said Bushman. “However, the majority of the sequence data we have so far remains unclassified, leaving us much work to do in order to better understand the human virome and how these new species may be associated with illness.”
The team analyzed samples from human lungs to sequence RNA and DNA in free-floating viral particles. Using this wide-ranging survey of viral sequences as a starting point to compare samples with known viral sequences in public databases, the team, including first authors Arwa A. Abbasand Louis J. Taylor, both graduate students working with Bushman and Collman, identified short sequences that were similar to a type of virus found in domesticated pig stool. From there, they identified whole genomes in the sample, which they recognized as a completely new human virus.
The team knew they might have discovered a virus because the sequence of DNA building blocks — that eventually form proteins — allowed them to recognize these as distant relatives of known viral molecules, which are important for making the virus particle shell and managing replication.
With this new virus in hand, they then searched for it in additional DNA sequence data. After scanning more than 7,000 samples in databases, they found 17 complete redondovirus genomes, and many more with partial sequences. That search revealed that this family of small, circular DNA viruses is associated with periodontitis —inflammation of the gums. They searched for it directly in patient samples and discovered that redondoviruses were also particularly abundant in the lungs of critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICU).
“Overall, we are asking whether we can we take unknown DNA sequences and make sense of it by identifying new viruses from the whole universe of sequences in the human virome,” Collman said.
The team is now working to grow redondovirus in the lab in order to investigate basic questions about its biology, as well as more clinical questions about its relationship to diseases. They hope that this direction will help determine if the new virus is simply associated with disease or whether it causes disease, and physicians might be able to use this knowledge to better help patients in the ICU and with dental disease.
Again: Scientists look for virus DNA in ill patients to find a new virus which might caused symptoms.
“Of the 60,000 types of germs that people come in contact with on a daily basis … only about 1 [percent] to 2 percent are potentially dangerous to normal people with normal immunity,”
https://courtneymedicalgroupaz.com/2019/03/04/4902/
“More than a quadrillion quadrillion individual viruses exist on Earth, but most are not poised to hop into humans.”
“Compared to viruses and cells that rely on DNA, RNA viruses tend to be sloppy when copying over their genetic code, introducing mutations at a high rate. This error-prone process creates an immense amount of diversity into populations of RNA viruses, allowing them to adapt to new environments—including new host species—at a rapid pace, says Sarah Zohdy, a disease ecologist at Auburn University.“
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/factors-allow-viruses-infect-humans-coronavirus
Does this sound easy to you to find viruses that could cause symptoms? Whatever your answer is: Do not worry. The CDC knows exactly (see Virus Bibel online) what to look for. They will let everyone know sooner or later: https://www.dropbox.com/s/1fi0dvysu2zakai/Video%2028-7-2022%2C%202%2019%2010%20pm.mov?dl=0
Let’s continue with this precise investigation.
Steps to design primers:
—» How does PCR work? «—
—» Receiving the primers you ordered is pretty exciting «— always wear a mask to void finding viruses you are currently hosting yourself in the “soup” for your PCR precision
Here we see it done the wrong way —> NO MASK !
Just kidding. A mask is not enough. The process for the PCR tests is best performed in an enclosed system to avoid the risk of contamination.
Here is another example of how to make sure your PCR test is contaminated:
Long thread about the inappropriate use of rtPCR technique in diagnosing infectious disease in modern medicine as supported by the inventor himself, #DrKaryMullis:
—>> Is there a standard <<— Variant and sub variant classifications are arbitrary:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6038767/
“You won’t believe what Covid-19 PCR tests are looking for”
https://rumble.com/v1f7bl1-you-wont-believe-what-covid-19-pcr-tests-are-looking-for.html
You can contact the Special Pathogens Branch of the CDC or Lipkin if you want to ask how they determine primers for everyone to use to identify viruses:
There you have it! Scientists can be very precise when they are told what and where to look for. Easy !
How do we know that we are not total idiots?
Well it’s easy —>> Just say and do what certain people say is not wrong and stupid. Use the tools and rules you are supposed to so you make sense the correct way. Be smart the correct way. <<— Easy !
BTW: The bullying stops when you just do what everyone does. Mark Pagel wrote about this normalisation process in his book:
Additionally, I highly recommend The Stupidity Paradox:
Just like scientists find primers of viral genomes, here are some random comments I found in the internet:
"There has been a lot of evidence gathered over the past 100 years that viruses exist." Where is it? Can you produce one paper that doesn't rely on the "viral culturing" of vero cells or the ASSEMBLY (not sequencing) of particulate RNA/DNA into some new Frankensteinian creature? The issue you seem to be avoiding again and again is that nobody can FIND a "virus" except through these two deceptive methods. The "virus" does not exist in REALITY. If as you believe, your wife "transmitted" this "virus" to you, then somebody should be able to find and IDENTIFY these "viruses" floating around in our environment - anywhere - on a table, counter, doorknob, bathroom counter, pillow, bed sheet, steering wheel, your hands etc. Or better yet, they could be easily found in the fluids and lung tissues of a sick person, right? How hard could it be? Why can nobody perform this simple task of finding a "virus" in REALITY? This is the PROBLEM with virology. On the one hand they claim we can spit/blow/wipe/sneeze/cough/spray/transfer these "viruses" between each other billions of times a day, every day, while at the same time claiming that nobody can actually FIND a REAL LIFE SAMPLE of a virus when looked for. How can a sick person spray millions/billions of viruses out into their immediate environment by talking/sneezing/coughing but nobody can analyze this polluted spray and find any viruses in it? This makes absolutely zero sense and no honest person can say with a straight face how this could possibly make any sense. How do you make sense of it? It's not a "size" problem regarding bacteriophages. Both are the same general size as alleged "viruses". So the small size is clearly not what is preventing the discovery of "viruses in the wild". So now what's their next excuse? Because there has to be one, right? Excuse B -> "There's not enough there to find". Really? There's enough there to make you sick as all get-out, but not enough there to find? Does that make sense? Nobody in the history of virology/immunology/microbiology has ever been able to FIND an alleged virus anywhere in the wild...ever? Does that make sense to you? The only way they find "viruses" is to pour urine onto monkey kidney cells and then douse them in poison, and/or ASSEMBLE chunks of RNA/DNA into a Frankensteinian model in a virtual reality simulation program?
Or simply show that my 4 observations of becoming I’ll. Each caused your own self to get sick, as is the case for all diseases, not just fake germ theory illnesses. Everybody hates this answer, and it's understandable as to why. The world at large isn't ready to hear this yet. We have been so deeply indoctrinated into "victim consciousness", that there's no graceful way to immediately unwind it. Step one is to allow for the possibility. Step two is to begin researching some of the big killers, i.e. heart diseases, cancers, etc. and see if we've really got the answers to what cause these dis-eases. Does a bad diet and poor exercise lead to heart disease? Is there irrefutable proof? How about cancer? Has somebody proven so-called carcinogens or mutation due to epigenetics? Look into it.
"Basically show me that the preponderance of the evidence favors A. Please explain why nobody has done that." -> Somebody has done that. And he spent the rest of his life being demonized, harassed, de-licensed, imprisoned, smeared, attacked, suppressed and ignored.
What do your "1000 measurements all consistent with a needle being in the haystack" consist of? A "Measurement" doesn't explain anything.
The issue at hand is very simple; nobody can FIND/LOCATE/ISOLATE any "viruses" floating around in our environment. Not in the air, not on any surfaces, not in the fluids of a sick person, nor in the bodily tissues of a living sick person, nor a dead person. If you buy the establishment virologists explanation as to why they can't pull off this seemingly simple feat, then there's really nothing left to talk about. You have chosen to BELIEVE their story...a story we find completely and utterly UNBELIEVABLE because there is zero science involved, and even more embarrassingly, zero control experiments involved. This is the land of pseudoscience and fairy tales where we just have to "take the experts word for it". Blind trust in authority is what's gotten us into this situation. A situation that is slowly but surely unwinding a little more each day now....
I only asked for 1 page (paper) that did NOT use the highly deceptive "viral culturing" or "RNA fragment assembly" manufacturing methods. I'm not aware of the existence of such a scientific paper so no burden on you...but you could ask a friend! :)
The 29K base pair creation represents nothing more than the entirely SPECULATIVE genetic ASSEMBLY of "unknown origin" RNA fragments in their Pokemon virtual reality software programs (MegaHit, Trinity), right? Surely we agree that nobody has a physical sample to compare to this presumptive "29K creature", right?
And all the other gene assembly teams around the world are piecing together their "29K...or so... virus" based on the data provided by the first guy. None of them are "starting from scratch". They all got a copy of the original "29K Book" to reference as they build their Pokemon variants. All of them are trying to assemble as near-identical a copy of the "29K book" as they can. But since a perfect replica is, by definition, impossible, their versions will always be slightly different.
Since nobody actually has a REAL LIFE "organism" ("virus") in their physical possession, what exactly do you believe there could be "exact agreement" upon other than more SPECULATIVELY ASSEMBLED Pokemon instances? I believe there are like 400,000-ish such Pokemon "variants" in the world's viral databases as of a relatively recent count from the documentary "The Viral Delusion". Quite an amazing creature it is. Darwin would be proud!
The experts tell us the following three facts are true:
Fact #1 - The experts claim we spread these so-called "Fully Intact 29K Base Pair Viruses" by talking, spittling, sneezing, coughing, breathing, spraying, etc. airborne particulates of our saliva/mucous. Said particulates are minute and effectively invisible, so much so that they wouldn't hardly register any volume or weight, and yet, they are more than enough to make anybody within breathing distance sick.
Fact #2 - The experts also claim that they are unable to find/locate/isolate any of these self-same "Fully Intact 29K viruses" from comparatively massive quantities of bodily fluids and tissues which are the very SOURCE of these alleged deadly airborne particulates. We are told that even with say a quart of a sick person's saliva, mucous, urine, blood, etc., no viruses can be found in the sample. Doctors Cowan and Kaufman were even told by an eminent virologist that no viruses could be found in a VAT of 10,000 sick people's bodily fluids.
Fact #3: Virologists also claim that they cannot find the "Fully Intact "29K Viruses" in the fluid/tissue samples that they load up into their virtual reality software programs, instead they are only ever able to find tiny fragments of these once fully-formed "29K virus" creatures.
Thus, we are being told by the experts that the mythical "Fully Intact 29K Virus" can be only be found in the minute airborne spittle bombs we unwittingly hurl at each other every day. The "Fully Intact 29K Virus" creature cannot exist "intact", or be found anywhere else.
I'm unable to reconcile these 3 "facts". They can't peacefully coexist by my reckoning.
What do you think? Can these 3 "facts" peacefully coexist in your mind?
How many doctors have referred to this as Chimeric? Not a product of natural evolution right? It need not be a virus at all. How was Moderna able to turn around a shot in 3 hours? Because they sequenced the genome? So, what's the problem? I'm just playing devil's advocate.
—» Speaking of precision «— The truth about viruses
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/the-truth-about-viruses:a
—» Warnings Signs You Have Been Tricked By Virologists…Again «—
https://drsambailey.com/warnings-signs-you-have-been-tricked-by-virologists-again/
Thinking out loud, testing ideas, and spreading awareness have pushed me to the economic edge. If you've found inspiration or gained insights, your support would mean a lot.
BTC: bc1qaw8sw2j75gt0wzwxdjelsuw0sxvsgj266cgdkm
RUNE: thor1l3x8glhdkqptpxae3tu9fsy9p6el0wzqewdgzv